You have been asked to get everything you want.
Not approximately.
Everything.
The shape. The feeling. The function. The speed. The beauty. The freedom. The certainty. The cost. The future.
Make all of it survive.
You already know it will not.
Something will have to be sacrificed.
That is where the real prompt begins.
Not:
What do you want?
But:
What are you unwilling to lose?
Because when everything fits, there is no decision.
The decision appears when two good things occupy the same space and only one can remain whole.
Speed may take precision.
Freedom may take protection.
Simplicity may take possibility.
Beauty may take explanation.
Control may take surprise.
Safety may take movement.
Nothing is wrong yet.
This is just reality entering the design.
The mistake is to pretend the sacrifice did not happen.
To bury it in the interface. To hide it in the contract. To call it optimization. To let the machine choose it silently. To discover later that the thing removed was the thing you actually cared about.
A good system does not promise that nothing will be lost.
It makes the loss visible before it becomes irreversible.
So the instruction is not:
Give me everything.
It is:
Get as close as reality allows. Protect what matters most. Show me what you had to trade. Do not sacrifice it silently.
That is enough.
Maybe more than enough.
Because perfection was never the useful information.
The useful information was always:
What survived the constraint?